From each of the furniture objects, the chair may be the primary one. While most other objects (save the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is meant to be viewed here in the general sense, from stool to throne to further makes such as a bench or sofa, which can be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and aesthetic item; it can also be symbolic of social standing. At the past royal courts there were social differences between sitting on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, or having to cope with a stool. From the past century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has risen a symbol of superior rank, and in democratic governments the speaker sits on a high-set platform.
As its furniture creation, the chair can be utilised for a range of different makes. There are chairs manufactured to match man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the past there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our lifestyle has demanded special chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair kinds have evolved to fit to growing human requirements. From its particular importance with man, the chair lives to its full purpose only when in employ. While it does not make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there is anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and judged best with a person utilising it, because chair and sitter suit one another. Thus the different limbs of a chair have been labeled likened to the areas of our human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the original purpose of your chair is to support our body, its worth is evaluated generally by how completely it fulfills this practical use. Within the manufacture of the chair, the designer is limited for some static laws and principal measurements. Under these restrictions, however, the chair designer has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair extended over a period of several thousand years. There existed civilizations that held individual chair forms, as expressions of the topmost craft in the industries of technique and design. Within these such peoples, individual note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the structures of skilled craft, were known from tomb findings. The first of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair had four legs formed as akin to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. From this a durable triangular construction was crafted. There was to our understanding no marked differentiation between the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common people. The only change lied in the kind of ornamentation, in the choice of costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was designed for an easily packed seat for army officers. As a camp stool the kind stayed around til much later times. But the stool then was made for the purpose of a ceremonial seat, its original job as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from evidence be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are constructed in the form of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats were made with wood. The plain construction of the folding stool, being of two frames that turn on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, appeared again some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of this kind is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not from any ancient item still in form but seen in a trove of pictorial items. The archetype is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location by Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those are visible. These strange legs were most likely to be manufactured of bent wood and were therefore needed to bear extreme pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints securing the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore extremely solid and were overtly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek style; quite a few models of seated Romans display chairs of a thicker and in appearance rather crudely constructed klismos. Both features, the light and heavy, were revived during the Classicist period. The klismos influence is seen in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some particular brands of considerable uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China cannot be charted as well as the ancestry of chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of images and works of art had been kept safe, detailing the interiors and outside of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Preserved also from the 16th century are a collection of chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that show an astonishing familiarity to designs of past chairs.
Just as in Egypt, there were two particular chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. That chair was seen both with and without arms though always with a square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to give support to the back. In one design, it has been seen, the stiles were marginally curved over the arms so as to conform correctly to the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of the chairback). Together, the three limbs had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Although the innovation of a back splat exercised a foundation for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that would merely to a particular extent stabilise corner joints (and furthermore were loose to top it off) indicate a design exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which ends about the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or has rounded edges—acknowledging maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have had a plaited texture. These chairs demanded of the sitter to be stiff and upright; if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs presumably were kept only for older people, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have come to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is elegantly fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the ultimate effect of both of these furniture items is stylized. The construction and decorative elements are combined in a style that is both naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual members do not seem to have been put together with either glue or screws, but had been mortised onto one another and locked into position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Works of art show a style of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some small iron hooks. Thus the chair was a portable piece of furniture for traveling which, at the same era, granted the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is evidenced in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this design of chair might also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not decided that the style actually originated in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin measurements; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in vast amounts, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike methods even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them have wood of relatively thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been cut away, and more upmarket examples might be further embellished with special delicate and decorative carvings. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry should be used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in form than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the favourite in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content